Infant Approval Hearing Case Study
The Injury
A child, Master X, suffered a delay in the diagnosis and treatment of a tongue-tie resulting in feeding difficulties and distress.
Represented by Krishna Kotecha, aSpecialist Medical Negligence Solicitor at MDS, the case involved the valuationof Master X’s claim and handling the infant settlement approval process
Yusuf, Trainee Solicitor, who assisted Krishna said – “This case highlights the importance of healthprofessionals listening to parental concerns, particularly regarding familymedical histories. A timely check for a Class II anterior tongue-tie could haveprevented the difficulties feeding and the associated distress for both MasterX and his parents.
It also underscores the importance of the infant approvalprocess which ensures that the settlement is fair and the compensation award isappropriately managed and invested until the child reaches the age of 18”.
Are you concerned about thequantification of a medical negligence claim or navigating the complexities ofan infant settlement approval hearing?
At MDS, we have extensive experience representing clients in complexmedical negligence claims involving children. Whether your case involvesquantifying a claim and/ or navigating the infant settlement approval process,we have the specialist knowledge to assist with securing the court’s approvaland protect your child’s future.
Our specialist team provides compassionate support and expert legaladvice tailored to your family’s unique situation. By instructing medicalexperts and Counsel, we thoroughly investigate every detail to achieve the bestpossible outcome. You will be supported by a dedicated specialist from day oneuntil your case is successfully concluded.
What Happened to Our Client?
- Following his birth, Master X's tongue-tie was not identified by medical staff despite the parents’ concern that he was struggling to feed and despite a known family history of tongue-tie.
- Some days after his birth, during a routine home visit, a Health Visitor weighed Master X and discovered he had lost a significant proportion of his birth weight. The Health Visitor identified an anterior tongue-tie.
- The condition, specifically a Class II anterior tongue-tie, was eventually treated privately.
Master X's father acted as a litigant in person and served a Letter of Claim on the hospital trust. The Trust admitted liability and made a settlement offer which was accepted by the litigant in person. The litigant in person instructed MDS to advise and to obtain the Court’s approval of the settlement.
Concerned about the quantification of a medical negligence claim ornavigating the complexities of an infant settlement approval hearing?
How can MDS help you?
While no amount of compensation will ever be enough for your child’ssuffering, if your family has been affected by healthcare negligence, we canhelp you through the legal process of investigating your concerns and managingyour negligence claim to ensure your child’s future is protected.
.webp)
.webp)
The Outcome of the Case
We instructed an Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) consultant to investigate the impact of the negligence. The expert determined that the primary injury was Master X’s inability to breastfeed causing weight loss and distress.
Settlement was approved at a Hearing at which Master X was represented by MDS.
Disclaimer
Whilst our case studies are designed to give an indication of the outcomes that can be achieved in these circumstances, the compensation awarded in individual cases can vary significantly due to a range of factors, including the severity of injury, effects on life expectancy and financial impact, for example. For more information, contact us today.
Our Approach
We will support you, guide you and be your voice throughout.
If you are concerned about the medical treatment that you or a loved one has received, please contact us and one of our specialist team will assist you.
